Prediction of Mathias Bourgue [515th] vs Dali Blanch [705th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L W L
Form
W L L W W L L L W WHead-2-Head: Bourgue 0 - 0 Blanch
| Bourgue | Stats | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (15-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (8-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 515 | Ranking | 705 |
| 140 | Highest Rank | 606 |
| 31 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (481-331) | Career Total W/L | 47% (104-115) |
| $143,480 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mathias Bourgue vs Dali Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bourgue 0 - 0 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bourgue has won 45.62% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 48.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bourgue, in recent form, has won 43.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 44.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.57% and 28.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bourgue has saved 51.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 47.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bourgue has won 54.24% of matches played (W/L 32/ 27), with Blanch winning 46.43% (W/L 26/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bourgue has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 264/ 178), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 52/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bourgue has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 24/ 12), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 21/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bourgue has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.37 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 183.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bourgue has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bourgue has converted 23.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 40.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mathias Bourgue vs Dali Blanch Best Odds For The Match
Mathias Bourgue Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Nikola Basic
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Mathias Bourgue
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Antoine Vincent
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Raphael Vaksmann
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Mikail Alimli
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Mathias Bourgue
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Charles Bertimon
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
13
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Mathias Bourgue
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Jacopo Bilardo
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Dali Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Dali Blanch
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Dali Blanch
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
0
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Dali Blanch
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Oscar Moraing
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Dali Blanch
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
Player
Dali Blanch
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Lilian Marmousez
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Bourgue vs Blanch?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bourgue Vs Blanch is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (481/331) | Win/Loss | 47% (104/115) |
| 57% (1076/808) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (255/260) |
| 53% (9433/8358) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2406/2421) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 3464 | Aces Total | 884 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1505 | Total Double Faults | 540 |
| 1:14:51 | Average Match Time | 1:31:39 |
| 200.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 224.93 |
| 63% (27061/42901) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7873/13278) |
| 70% (18985/27061) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5399/7873) |
| 50% (7968/15840) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2625/5405) |
| 40% (1631/4043) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (536/1248) |
| 39% (16485/42654) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5246/13418) |
| 60% (472/791) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (103/218) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (144/263) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (21/43) |
| 56% (146/261) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (30/78) |
| 88% (450/398) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (121/90) |
| 11% (450/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (121/31) |
| 23% (362/82) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (98/14) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dali Blanch
View full predicted draw for Blanch
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
